All-or-nothing thinking about your own performance
A project that's 90% excellent and 10% flawed often registers, to a perfectionist, as simply flawed — there's no partial credit in the internal scoring system, which means almost nothing ever actually counts as good enough, regardless of the objective quality.
Procrastination that looks like the opposite of perfectionism
Starting something late or not at all can actually be perfectionism in disguise — if it can't be done flawlessly, avoiding it entirely protects against the risk of producing something imperfect, which feels safer than trying and falling short.
Why the standard is really about fear, not quality
Perfectionism is often less about caring deeply about the work and more about caring deeply about what a mistake would reveal — that you're not as capable as people think, which makes the standard about self-protection more than about the actual output.
What loosening the grip actually looks like
Deliberately shipping something at 'good enough' and tracking what actually happens afterward — usually nothing close to the catastrophe imagined — is what retrains the standard over time, more effectively than trying to reason your way out of it in the abstract.
High standards aren't the problem here — the problem is when the standard is enforced through fear and self-punishment rather than through genuine care about the work.
If you can't remember the last time you finished something and actually felt satisfied instead of immediately finding what's wrong with it, OLENRI can help you look at where that standard came from. Look at that standard, in OLENRI